Crypto Thoughts

Disclaimer How Should a Crypto Fund handle Carried Interests?   In 2017, the law applicable to carried interests was changed so that GPs didn’t get long term capital gain unless the underlying asset had been held for 3 years (instead of one year).   In addition, it was recently proposed that such holding period should be increased to 5 years and measured from the later of the date the fund was substantially invested and the date the asset was acquired.   That proposal does not look like it will become law soon, but it will likely continue to be a part of future proposals.   So what can a fund do to minimize the tax paid by its GPs?   One solution is to never sell an asset that has less than a three year holding period.   That might work for VC funds or PE funds, but it doesn’t work for funds that need to sell assets to fund redemptions or for funds that continually rebalance their portfolio.   In that case, even if 20% of the...

  Token Compensation Income   As I’ve said multiple times in this blog, I don’t think that conventional wisdom from the VC world translates all that well into the crypto world.   One example relates to tokens issued as compensation.   Leaving aside all the questions about whether a four year vest makes sense, and more significantly, whether a double trigger acceleration on change of control is even relevant (on Network Launch I get it), there are some significant economic questions for employees.   In the VC world, you may often want to early exercise a stock option, make an 83(b) election (which causes you to be taxed as if you’d received the shares on the exercise date without any restriction (vesting)), and then hope that the stock appreciates so that you have income that is taxed as long term capital gain.   That’s a good plan where the exercise price is low enough and there is no market for the stock.     But out...